Thin Green Slices

When you are out with your camera do you compose your images through the viewfinder or with your eye? Probably it’s a bit of each. If through the viewfinder then it may be that subconsciously you look for compositions that fit the shape of your viewfinder. If with your eye then perhaps you are more aware of compositional possibilities that do not neatly fit those dimensions. And have you ever wondered why the viewfinder is that shape, anyway? Thank, or blame, Kodak.

click to see an enlarged image

A bit of history: In 1934 Kodak introduced the 135 film standard, which rapidly overtook the 120 film format and came to dominate the industry. It’s not an exaggeration to say that the adoption of the 135 film standard dictated the construction and engineering of all 35mm cameras thereafter. Based on a film width of 35mm including the sprocket holes, individual full-frame images on 135 film are 24mm wide by 36mm long. I bet anyone reading this will have a few packets of colour prints along with their negative strips in a drawer somewhere – and those negative filmstrips will be of 135 film.

This format has been carried over into the digital era: the sensor size on full frame dSLR cameras being 24x36mm.

The dimensional ratio of 135 film is 2:3 or (for easier comparisons) 1:1.5. Why was that ratio chosen? Was it for aesthetic reasons? What were the driving factors – were they creative or optical engineering? I don’t know the answer to that – maybe one of you reading this does.

If you have a DX dSLR camera or a digital compact the ratio of images you capture may be slightly different. But most will be in the range 1:1.33 to 1:1.5. Digital photo papers in the UK (and maybe elsewhere) are based on the A paper series and all sizes within that series are based on the square root of 2 (meaning a ratio of 1:1.41). That’s pretty close to the 135 standard. The consequence of that near match is that an image prints fairly easily on A series paper (commonly A3 or A4) with a minimal trim.

click to see an enlarged image

That match between image and paper makes life easy but it also makes a huge assumption: that we usually see images with a dimensional ratio of 1:1.5 or thereabouts. But who says the world around us is that shape compositionally? It isn’t always. We’re back to the first paragraph of this post. It’s very easy to fall into the trap of viewing the world through a viewfinder and seeking images that fit that frame, rather than finding the images that work compositionally and concentrating on capturing them with room to spare and cropping the image when it is processed.

Sometimes those compositions can be long and thin – images that are called ‘Letter Box’ shape – where the dimensional ratio may be 1: 3 or even 1:4. It takes courage sometimes to fiercely crop an image, but the impact of those compositions will be lost if what is irrelevant or extraneous isn’t cropped from the original image.

click to see an enlarged image

The three images in this post have all been taken in my garden. I saw them all as ‘Letter Box’ compositions. You’ll have to take my word for that. In the first two images all that has been cropped out was more green foreground and background that added nothing – it just diluted the essential composition. In the third image, the top half of the original image was burnt out sky above the top of the boundary wall of our garden that forms the background to the image – that sky added nothing, it distracted. The composition I saw was purely the shaft of late evening sun that was highlighting a thin line of long grass in our orchard.

The message is: don’t be a slave to the viewfinder or the 135 standard. Think outside the box. You will find great images that break all the rules. Do click on the images to see enlarged versions of them

Advertisements

About LensScaper

Hi - I'm a UK-based photographer who started out 45+ years ago as a lover of landscapes, inspired by my love of outdoor pursuits: skiing, walking and climbing. Now retired, I seldom leave home without a camera and I find images in unexpected places and from different genres. I work on the premise that Photography is Art and that creativity is dependent on the cultivation of 'A Seeing Eye'. I'm not averse to manipulating images to produce derivatives that may sometimes be far removed from the original.
This entry was posted in Garden Plants and Wild Flowers, Microscapes and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Thin Green Slices

  1. andybeel says:

    Hi Andy an intellgent and well thought out post. One of my original thoughts on composition – use or lose it!. Thanks Andy

    • LensScaper says:

      Thanks Andy, glad you enjoyed it. ‘Use it or lose it’ was a phrase I frequently quoted to some of my patients who were becoming increasingly sedentary as they aged!

  2. rigmover says:

    Great post Andy, and great bit of history, thanks.

  3. Len says:

    Very interesting post Andy. Never really thought about the shape of the viewfinder. Great observation. I’ve always thought about the sizes of stock frames at stores and how they force your image into a sr=tandard size. Nice one.

    • LensScaper says:

      Thanks Len. I had thought of including reference to Frames but thought I might bore folk a bit! But there is also a trend in the use of stock frames for exhibitions in the UK – All images whatever their size being displayed in a standard frame size (usually 40x50cms) with the images in bevelled mounts cut to fit the individual images. For display purposes that works really well.

  4. oneowner says:

    Instructors in college course photography set up assignments that had to be photographed with 35mm slides. The slide format didn’t allow students to crop and that’s what the instructors tried to get across to the students – crop in the camera since it was considered small format. Thankfully, that paradigm has shifted over the years, but old habits are hard to break.

    • LensScaper says:

      Many thanks for that comment, Ken. I know of some photographers who adhere to that concept. It’s a very restrictive paradigm. It can be useful as a test of skill, or as an assignment but it misses the creative nature of both the world and photography.

  5. Great post Andy. I’m a big fan and proponent of this letterbox or cinematic cropping style, and have posted several images on my blog that have utilized this format.

  6. Really great post Andy. I hope most people today think outside the box…or the viewfinder. I know I try too. Fantastic images.

  7. Rick says:

    Very informational post. I love the letterbox crop. I’ve done it a few times, especially for collages that go into making videos.

  8. seekraz says:

    More to process, Andy…thank you for the info…and very nice photos, too…simple and appropriate to the text.

Comments are closed.